Search Thought Leadership


To refine your search select a single option or a combination of options:

reset
 

THOUGHT LEADERSHIP

Globe - Europe 1
June 19, 2020
European Parliament Approves CRR “Quick Fix” to Mitigate Economic Consequences of COVID-19
The measures grant relief for EU banks to enhance bank lending to companies and households.
Share
view
Displaying Thought Leadership item(s) associated with lawyer Jonathan Strang
20 results
 
  • September 03, 2019
     
    Gavel on US flag Article in Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal examines two procedural changes that impact concurrent district court patent infringement litigation and inter partes proceedings before the US Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
     
    Share
    view
  • July 19, 2018
     
    Patent - PTAB webcast series Latham lawyers discuss the latest developments in post-grant proceedings and patent litigation.
     
    Share
    view
  • October 18, 2017
     
    Marble steps By giving patent owners a more effective tool for amending claims during an IPR proceeding, the Federal Circuit’s latest en banc decision changes the way stakeholders approach these proceedings.
     
    Share
    view
  • June 29, 2017
     
    Legal books Latham lawyers present recommendations on how the PTAB may provide greater transparency and clarity on procedural requirements for filing motions to amend, in an article published by Bloomberg BNA's Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal.
     
    Share
    view
  • February 24, 2017
     
    gavel & scales In a Law360 Expert Analysis article, the authors propose creating an “en banc” rehearing procedure at the US Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
     
    Share
    view
  • September 19, 2016
     
    gavel & book Questions on IP litigation at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board? Latham has answers.
     
    Share
    view
 
 
Notice: We appreciate your interest in Latham & Watkins. If your inquiry relates to a legal matter and you are not already a current client of the firm, please do not transmit any confidential information to us. Before taking on a representation, we must determine whether we are in a position to assist you and agree on the terms and conditions of engagement with you. Until we have completed such steps, we will not be deemed to have a lawyer-client relationship with you, and will have no duty to keep confidential the information we receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.